The government’s decision to ban away
days for civil servants as part of a ‘crackdown on wasteful
spending’ has been met with concern.
In an announcement
on 6 April, the Government imposed a ban on off-site employee training and
team building. With all training now to be held in all freely available
government buildings rather than external venues, the saved funds will be redirected
to Britian’s Plan for Change.
Tina Benson Photo Credit: SuppliedHowever, the move away from employee off-sites
could spell trouble for employee morale and productivity, warns corporate
events specialist and Team
Tactics founder, Tina Benson.
“The government’s decision to ban the hire of external
venues for away days could be somewhat self-defeating. Providing
a change of scenery for company conferences and away days can
be transformative, helping employees connect away from the day-to-day
and creating the right conditions and mindset for valuable ideation
and innovation.
“Away from the same four walls of the office, and the
distraction of emails and phones, employees begin to move away from the
transactional nature of work-focused interactions to build deeper, more
meaningful connections and collaborate on a more strategic level.”
According to research from Harvard
Business Review, 88 per cent of people believe in-person interactions,
such as meetings, offsites and workshops, are critical for
ensuring positive long-term relationships between employees and
coworkers.
Research also suggests a link
between away days and work efficiency, with another study
indicating a 26
increase increase in employee
productivity after participating in offsite retreats.
“At a time the government is aiming to drive
productivity and efficiencies, the decision to keep team events on-site
could hinder efforts and defeat the intended purpose and spirit of these
activities,” Benson added.
“While funding to rebuild the NHS and our education system
should undoubtedly be the priority for taxpayer’s money, away day
venues don’t always require big budgets to be effective. The Cabinet
Office should reconsider its approach and recognise the value in
giving civil servants time and space outside government walls for
relationship building, bigger-picture thinking – and crucially – to stay
connected with the communities they’re representing.”
Benson also raised concerns about the ‘rolling effect’ that
moving team building activities in-house could trigger for the government.
“If departments are required to organise their
own team building activities, this means civil servants
taking time away from their vital roles, piling on unnecessary stress and
compromising the quality of the experience. And, if they move to cancel
their team building events altogether, they risk further damaging the morale of
the workforce.
“Professional team building companies exist to
deliver meaningful, tailored experiences to help teams bond,
collaborate more effectively and ultimately,
perform better. It's about creating the conditions for people to
come together, grow trust and work better as one, and we cannot afford to
lose that in the push to drive down costs.”